波塞冬（全文在线阅读）>
波塞冬As Japan pours billions into defense dreaming of arms-led prosperity, many warn history’s darkest chapters offer a sobering lesson_我的网站
A |
B | Sea of Remnants 由 Joker Studios 开发，网易游戏（NetEase Games）发行，近期已宣布将于今年 12 月进行封闭测试。在开幕之夜直播前，我们采访了游戏的创意总监 Alfie，请他拆解全新的实机演示，并深入探讨 2027 年游戏正式发售时等待着玩家的秘密。
C | Sea of Remnants 创意总监详解独家实机演示与游戏机制问： 在这段独家实机演示中，有哪些具体的机制或瞬间是玩家最应该关注的？Alfie： 我认为有三个元素特别独特。首先是游戏的 Roguelike 结构。通过将 Roguelike 的成长性与回合制战斗及骰子机制相结合，战斗充满了不可预测性和可能性。 Editor's Note:  Pursuing a military Keynesian path Japan's 2026 Defense White Paper, at 598 pages, has set a record as the longest in history. More alarming than its length, however, is the document's first-ever explicit definition of the development of the defense industry as an effective means of promoting "economic growth." "The white paper 'stresses that investment in defense benefits the wider economy and people's lives,' according to a Defense Ministry presentation document," reported Reuters on August 4. "That message aligns with Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's broader use of strategic state spending in an effort to drive economic growth," Reuters commented. Previously, The Asahi Shimbun warned in an opinion piece that this entanglement of defense buildup with economic policy will, over time, slide into "military Keynesianism." "Military Keynesianism" refers to the use of military spending as a tool to stimulate overall economic development. Since the Takaichi administration took office, Japan has been expanding its domestic defense market through year-on-year increases in the defense budget, while at the same time opening up international sales channels for defense production by relaxing export controls - thereby systematically pursuing a military Keynesian path. In fiscal 2026, Japan's defense budget for the first time exceeded 9 trillion yen ($56.5 billion). Its defense-related spending has already reached 2 percent of GDP, according to The Japan Times. This not only means Japan's defense budget has risen for 14 consecutive years, but also indicates that the government is using fiscal stimulus to artificially create a large and relatively stable "arms market." The resulting closed-loop logic is clear: the government increases defense spending to expand procurement; defense companies receive orders and scale up production; and, through industrial-chain spillovers, related industries also expand output. As Japan's new Defense White Paper says, higher defense expenditures will not only significantly increase orders in the defense industry, but also reinforce the defense production base through measures such as introducing mechanisms to assess corporate efforts and calculate appropriate profits for companies. These measures, the paper claims, are expected to generate economic ripple effects, "as well as technological ripple effects into the civilian sector." What is even more alarming is that Japan is systematically removing the institutional barriers to the growth of its defense industry. One long-standing challenge in postwar Japan has been the limited size of its domestic defense market and restrictions on arms exports, which have kept defense firms' profits relatively low and prompted some major companies to withdraw from parts of the military supply business, observers pointed out. In 2022, however, Japan elevated the defense industry to a national strategic priority in its three key security documents, National Security Strategy, National Defense Strategy and Defense Buildup Program. In 2023, it enacted the Act on Enhancing Defense Production and Technology Bases, allowing the government to sustain and reinforce defense manufacturing through subsidies, capital investment and other measures. And in April this year, the Takaichi administration formally lifted the ban on exports of lethal weapons, fully opening the door for Japan's defense industry to enter global markets. Together, these moves show that Japan is no longer content with relying on its Self-Defense Forces' limited procurement needs. It seeks to turn itself into a global arms supplier. This will inevitably intensify the regional arms race and seriously destabilize the security landscape in East Asia, warned some experts reached by the Global Times. Of particular concern is that the focus of Japan's military Keynesianism has shifted from traditional weapons such as guns and artillery, to high-tech fields including artificial intelligence (AI) and drones, with an explicit emphasis on civil-military integration. Japan's new Defense White Paper places special emphasis on AI and unmanned systems, which are expected to become central issues in the year-end revision of its three key security documents. Widespread criticism and concern Japan's bid to jolt economic growth through higher military spending amounts to little more than a wishful gamble that "guns for butter" can be turned on its head. But when the fiscal question of "where will the money come from?" collides with public anxiety over "where is people's livelihood headed?", voices from international media outlets to Japanese scholars, lawmakers and ordinary citizens alike, are warning that the narrative of arms-led prosperity is not only unlikely to work, but could also drag Japan's economy into dangerous territory, observers noted. Japan's fiscal expenditure faces "competing demands on the public purse," "but Takaichi has yet to explain clearly how she would pay for a further expansion without adding pressure on Japan's already stretched public finances," Reuters said on August 4. In a Japanese-language editorial piece on August 8, The Asahi Shimbun pushed the debate further toward livelihoods, saying that military expansion would place a direct strain on the daily lives of Japanese people. The piece also cited a United Nations study saying that reallocating the same resources to education and healthcare rather than the military could generate more jobs. The International Monetary Fund has also warned that rising defense spending may, in the medium term, increase economic vulnerabilities, including through wider fiscal deficits, it said. Strong criticism also echoes across Japan's political arena. House of Representatives member Joji Yamamoto accused the Takaichi administration of doubling defense spending and lifting bans on weapons exports, while shifting healthcare costs onto patients and eroding elderly care systems. If left unchecked, Japan will gradually turn into a nation sustained by the arms trade, seriously violating people's right to subsistence guaranteed by law, Yamamoto told the Global Times. A risky gamble Military Keynesianism is not only unlikely to sustain long-term economic growth in Japan, but also carries hidden security risks. Koji Sonoda, deputy editor at The Asahi Shimbun's Political News Section, recently cautioned that if defense budget expansion, initially justified by a deteriorating security environment, comes instead to serve the goal of economic growth through industrial promotion, the risk grows that spending will lose any effective restraint. History has already proven this point. The global economic depression of 1929 triggered the Showa Depression in Japan, pushing the country's economy to the brink of collapse. At the time, rather than pursuing structural reforms, Japan's political and military leadership shifted the national economy onto a wartime footing, using military spending to boost demand and mask unemployment. Meng Mingming, assistant researcher at the Institute of Japanese Studies of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, told the Global Times that in 1932, Korekiyo Takahashi, Japan's then Finance Minister, rolled out stimulus policies including yen depreciation and expanded fiscal outlays. Massive military spending paired with public works projects lifted domestic demand and enabled Japan to recover from the recession earlier than many nations. Takahashi became known as "Japan's Keynes." However, the prosperity driven by fiscal deficits and military-industrial expansion was ultimately a shortsighted fix. Meng pointed out that, first, while wartime demand boosted Japan's heavy chemical and weapons manufacturing sectors to some extent, most military output was removed from the social reproduction cycle and constituted sheer waste. Second, heavy chemical industries relied heavily on resources such as oil, which Japan lacked domestically. This created a vicious cycle: military demand expanded heavy industrial capacity; that expansion increased Japan's dependence on overseas resources and markets; rising resource needs drove further military expansion to secure supply chains; and that expansion in turn required even more defense spending, further militarizing the economy. Finally, a coalition of interest formed among heavy industrial capitalists, emerging zaibatsu and the military. Military adventurism was no longer driven solely by the armed forces, but was backed by industrial and financial power.  Currently, many Japanese citizens have recognized the dangers of the Takaichi administration's policies and taken to the streets to protest. Kazuo Adachi, a sexagenarian, told the Global Times in Japan that behind the administration's claim that the defense industry fuels growth lies the profit motive of the military-industrial complex. From policy deregulation launched under the Abe administration to accelerated implementation under the Takaichi administration, the path of military expansion catering to arms capital is akin to poison, fraught with alarming risks. Marin Toyosu, a member of Japan's Generation Z, said the Takaichi administration's aggressive push for war preparedness essentially hides a self-serving agenda under the slogan of a "virtuous cycle between security and the economy." It abandons vulnerable groups to benefit a small circle of arms capitalists and represents an administration bent on stoking conflict. "This military expansion agenda harms Japanese citizens and endangers people across the world," she noted. Tatara Satoshi, an anti-war activist, pointed out that the Takaichi administration hypes up the "China threat" to justify military buildup while pushing the flawed argument that the defense industry can boost the economy. This does not reflect the genuine aspirations of Japanese society or ordinary citizens. "Japanese people do not want war with China. They should unite to firmly oppose efforts to advance military expansion by stoking tensions and overstating supposed economic benefits," he said. Global Times 。我们也希望玩家在体验游戏时能关注音乐。我们投入了大量心血，为海上航行、海岛探索、战斗以及许多其他场景创作了独特的音乐氛围。最后，玩家每周都可能在 Sea of Remnants 的世界中发现一名新的船员。我们希望在“遗忘航行”（Forgotten Voyage）中的每一次重逢，都像重新找回你的伙伴一样。
D | 同时，每增加一名船员都会引入新的团队阵容和组合，使 Roguelike 循环更加丰富，并开启更多可能性。问： 在 Sea of Remnants 中，你认为哪种机制或惊喜会让玩家真正感到措手不及？Alfie： Sea of Remnants 充满了小细节和隐藏的互动，我们希望玩家能亲自去发现。例如，如果你在开放世界的某个地方看到一把不起眼的躺椅，试着坐下来。那一刻，你可能会忘却一切，单纯享受宁静。如果非要选一个真正的惊喜，那就是每周都有机会发现一名新船员。有时我可能希望能找到船员 A，结果却遇到了船员 B。这可能会打乱我原本的计划，但也可能开启全新的可能性。问： 海洋与陆地的双重设定对世界观构建意味着什么？Alfie： 创造一个海洋幻想世界无疑是我们最大的挑战之一。这类题材天生带有神秘感，每个人对其样貌都有自己的见解。我们花了很长时间思考如何让我们的游戏脱颖而出，构建一个原创且令人信服的世界，这促使我们开发了详尽的历史和神话体系，以赋予设定深度和内在逻辑。例如，我们的岛屿设计得尽可能真实可信，并辅以完整的 24 小时昼夜循环等细节。当玩家探索岛屿和城镇时，我们希望他们感觉到这些是真实的、有人居住的地方。在这个写实的世界里，他们也会遇到许多奇特而富有想象力的元素；但一切都自然地存在于设定中，并遵循其自身的一致逻辑。问： 游戏以“起航、探索、收集、返回”的节奏运行。Orbtopia 在这个循环中扮演什么角色？Alfie： Orbtopia 在这个循环中起着核心作用。游戏分为两个相互关联的层面：千变万化的海上航行，以及作为这个海洋世界安全港湾的 Orbtopia。
E | 玩家反复从城市起航，带着冒险所得返回。航行中运回的战利品可以在 Orbtopia 中使用，用于培养船员、升级船只并增强你的整体能力。这种成长让你能航行得更远，克服更困难的挑战，并在未来的航行中带回更丰厚的奖励。问： 配合游戏的回合制战斗，玩家在不同轮次的冒险中需要做出哪些调整？Alfie： 为了支持多样化的流派构筑，我们的战斗系统需要容纳大量的技能和一定程度的随机性。经过广泛的测试和迭代，我们最终选择了回合制战斗，因为它能让我们充分展现游戏 Roguelike 构筑系统的自由度和多样性。我们还将 Roguelike 元素直接整合到了回合制战斗系统中，包括可以赋予角色额外行动机会的骰子机制。这为每次遭遇战增加了不可预测性，同时也为战略决策和不同机制间的互动创造了更多机会。一旦玩家达到一定等级，一些较弱的敌人可以通过简化的实时战斗来击败。这让玩家能将更多精力集中在重要的 Boss 战和探索更广阔的世界。问： 你如何在 Roguelike 元素与长线成长系统之间取得平衡？Alfie： 针对特定航行的构筑在每一轮冒险中提供了更快、更显著的成长感，而 Orbtopia 的进度则奠定了持久的基础。在每次航行中，玩家可以通过各种构筑选择来塑造团队，创造强大的组合和协同效应。这些选择多样且灵活，确保了每次航行都带有不确定性。然而，团队在海上的表现也建立在 Orbtopia 中实现的永久性进度之上。如果玩家遇到特别强大的对手，他们可以返回城市强化角色的核心能力，为未来更广阔世界的挑战做好准备。
F | Sea of Remnants 创意总监确认游戏将提供自定义功能并适配多种玩法问： 游戏将如何适配不同的玩法风格？Alfie： 玩家可以跟随主线剧情，以稳定的节奏探索我们的主要岛屿。在此过程中，他们将了解角色，发现这个世界的本质，并体验那些让世界显得丰富且真实的细节。或者，玩家也可以开启“遗忘航行”，快速确定下一个目标，直接迎接新挑战。体验游戏的方式有很多种，玩家可以根据当下的心情进行选择。问： 自定义功能的深度如何？Alfie： 我们相信情感纽带是通过反复的航行以及玩家在磨炼和精通每个角色上投入的时间自然产生的。让同一名船员使用不同的职业和构筑，可以产生完全不同的战斗风格。发现这些可能性并使其发挥作用，会让玩家与角色之间产生共同的成就感，同时也加深了玩家对该船员的理解。我们还在继续扩展每个角色的故事和相关内容，让玩家有更多机会在战斗和成长之外，与他们的船员建立持久的联系。问： 玩家在远征期间的决策如何影响叙事和周围的世界？Alfie： 玩家在 Orbtopia 做出的决定会对城市及其居民产生切实的影响。
G | 例如，玩家可能会赶走某些人，甚至导致城市陷入衰落。
H | 而在海上的 Roguelike 航行中，决策更侧重于玩家如何发展自己的构筑。不同的技能和能力组合会导致截然不同的结果，塑造每次航行的走向。问： 当 Sea of Remnants 明年发布时，你期待玩家会有什么反应？Alfie： 我们的目标是让玩家在游戏中找到快乐和娱乐，同时通过探索发现一个身临其境且真实可信的海洋世界。
I | 创造一个感觉真实且令人信服的世界对我们来说一直至关重要。Sea of Remnants 将于 2027 年登陆 Android、iOS、PC、PlayStation 5 和 Xbox Series X/S 平台。
J | Current article:http://nm7c5.qingfanceliangsangniang.cfd/news/20260826_6217539.html Published on:18:36:48 |
当 Sea of Remnants 明年发布时，它将带来一场免费的动作角色扮演体验。玩家既能在各种侠盗风格的回合制任务中驰骋于广阔海面，也能在游戏虚构的“Orbtopia”世界中探索陆地任务。随着 2026 年 Gamescom 开幕之夜直播中全新预告片的发布，现在我们可以深入了解这段超过 10 分钟的实机演示。
